Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: have until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to take leave and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal staff members as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it a lot an offer. I believe it’s a demand to resign with an unclear guarantee that, job potentially, job you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to use in this scenario. When you think about a buyout, there’s generally some sort of composed agreement or a concrete offer to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, job what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is exercise severe care. There are no assurances contained in this email. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than meant can have serious effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is an excellent deal for individuals who do not desire to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work really tough to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes because there are no assurances. And these are people who enjoy their job. They enjoy the mission of the company. They strive. And today, they’re facing really tough options, particularly if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I think a great deal of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the deal itself may be challengeable. I believe the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists today for OPM to order firms to provide this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite perhaps setting the phase for challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website terms of usage and consents pages at www.npr.org for additional information.

NPR records are produced on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its last form and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.